Moreover, he provided an original platonic criticism in the fields of logic, epistemology, psychology and metaphysics and replaced with his own views of illuminationist theories. This paper is intended to give a comprehensive description over the philosophical theories elaborated by Shihabudheen al Suhrawardi.
Introduction Suhrawardi critiques the Aristotelian tradition on a number of points including its theory of definition, it classification of categories and accidents, its cylo morphism, its theory of vision, its rejection of platonic forms and the primacy it gives to existence over essence.
Especially he developed a mixed methodology to that of Aristotelians what was rational logical method emerging from premises to the conclusion with his theory of Illumination. But he tries to stand between to strands of Aristotelianism and Sufism not only says to balance thought rationally but also to purify selves for receiving divine light the knowledge.
So his thought could be analyzed as a movement from a discursive philosophy hikma bahthiyya to an intuitive philosophy hikma dhawqiyya. Between both of al Razi and Suhrawardi held many scholastic debates and dialouges. Later he travelled to Isfahan, there studied with the logician Zahir al Farisi.
He is suspected to be met with the mystic Fakhrudheen al Maridini d. He spent several years in southwest Anatolia, associating with Seljuq rulers and princes. He had kept connection with Ibn al- 'Arabi. It is said to be one of the reason for his execution that the claim prophecy is something like al Imamah what could be achieved always by any man. Besides this, he is also accused to having the claim of prophethood.
Knowledge is light what illuminates on the Hearts of Arif The knower. At this point the Illuminationist must employ discursive philosophy to analyze the experience and systematize it, in the same way as with sensory experience. Physical world Varying from the peripatetic division of matter and form Suhrawardi introduce a world of bodies constructed by light and darkness.
Hence, from the thirteen century up to the twenty-first century, quite a few commentators have delved deeper into the matter van Lit , — Ziai , ; cf. Walbridge , —10 speculates that he tried to put into practice the political dimension i. In search of felicity, souls must attempt to detach themselves from their tenebrous bodies and all that is worldly and material and seek to access the world of immaterial lights.
Souls engrossed in matter in this life partially determine their fate in the afterlife. Prophets, saints and exceptionally gifted mystics are the ones best able to achieve conjunction with the world of pure lights. Ascetic practices in this life can become a means to attain self-consciousness of the ontic light reality of the soul. The posthumous life of individual souls and their ability to perceive the promised other-worldly rewards and punishments become conditions for divine retribution.
By the end of the 13 th century, at least two of his works were readily available and studied in the major centers of learning of Syria Damascus and Aleppo , Iraq Baghdad and Iran Maraghah , some of which circulating most probably before his death. Two major trends within the commentarial tradition of the 13 th century were to shape later developments: one wass exemplified by Ibn Kammuna d. Ibn Kammuna, a Jewish philosopher greatly influenced by both Avicenna and Suhrawardi, is the first commentator Langermann , —; Pourjavady and Schmidtke , 23—32; Eichner who, while in Baghdad, completes in his commentary on the logic, physics and the metaphysics of Intimations Ibn Kammuna , Having resided in Aleppo, he could well be, with such works as The Revealer , completed in ; Langermann , the link between Suhrawardi and Shahrazuri who writes the earliest commentary on the Philosophy of Illumination ca.
Marcotte Mulla Sadra Sadr al-Din al-Shirazi d. Mulla Sadra, like Hadi Sabzawari d. During the 17 th century, the enigmatic Ahmad Ibn al-Harawi probably from Herat , who lived in the Indian subcontinent, translates the Philosophy of Illumination into Persian on which he writes a commentary Harawi Azar Kayvan d. Van Lit provides a chronological sketch of eighteen commentators on Suhrawardi, including lesser-known ones , — Cataloguing and making accessible hundreds of philosophical works in Arabic and Persian from the 12 th —19 th century, like the recent publication of the Persian Inner Light of Shihab al-Din Kumijani d.
Two main schools of thought dominate the historiography of the Illuminationist tradition. Henry Corbin, the father of contemporary Suhrawardiana studies, introduced this paradigm Gutas , 16—9. Pourjavady Some, like Fakhry , go so far as to question the originality of the isharqi elements of his work, deeming it a mere transposition of Avicennan philosophy into a light terminology.
Ziai focuses primarily on his logic; whereas Walbridge studied, first, the work of Qutb al-Din Shirazi d. Gheissari et al. The author would like to thank both Professor Saeed Anvari for his invaluable suggestions on the update published in [April ] we regret having been unable to address his queries before he completed his Persian translation, cf.
Suhrawardi , Tehran: Quqnus, , and Professor Sajjad Rizvi for his equally invaluable suggestions that led to improvements in the update published in March Life and Works 1. Logic 2. Physics 3. Metaphysics 4. Politics and Ethics 6. Avicenna Ibn Sina , , Al-Mubahathat , ed. Chandrasekharan, critical ed.
Abdul Haq and M. Ali Awjabi, Tehran: Mirath-i Maktub. A Parallel English-Arabic Text , trans. Najafquli Habibi, Tehran: Mirath-i Maktub. Mir Damad, , Jadhawat wa Mawaqit , ed. Mehdi Mohaghegh, Toshihiko Izutsu et al. A Parallel Persian-English Text , ed. Wheeler M. A Parallel English-Persian Text , ed. Hossein Nasr, French intro. Christian Jambet, Paris: Verdier. Peter Adamson ed. Tzvi Langermann ed. Gaffari, Muhammad K. Philosophie in der islamischen Welt III, Jahrhundert , Basel: Schwabe Verlag.
Langermann, Y. Zalta ed. Marcotte, Roxanne D. Yanis Eshots, Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura, , 68— Jon McGinnis, with David C. Reisman, Leiden: Brill, — Questions et connaissances , 3 vols, ed. Arising out of peripatetic philosophy as developed by Ibn Sina Avicenna , Suhrawardi's illuminationist philosophy is critical of several of Ibn Sina's positions and radically departs from him in creating a symbolic language mainly derived from ancient Iranian culture or Farhang-e Khosravani to give expression to his wisdom hikma.
Suhrawardi taught a complex and profound emanationist cosmology , in which all creation is a successive outflow from the original Supreme Light of Lights Nur al-Anwar. The fundamental of his philosophy is pure immaterial light, where nothing is manifest, and which unfolds from the Light of Lights in a descending order of ever-diminishing intensity and, through complex interaction, gives rise to a "horizontal" array of lights, similar in conception to Platonic forms , that governs mundane reality.
In other words, the universe and all levels of existence are but varying degrees of Light—light and darkness. In his division of bodies, he categorizes objects in terms of their reception or non-reception of light. Suhrawardi considers a previous existence for every soul in the angelic realm before its descent to the realm of the body.
The soul is divided into two parts, one remains in heaven and the other descends into the dungeon of the body. The human soul is always sad because it has been divorced from its other half. Therefore, it aspires to become reunited with it.
The soul can only reach felicity again when it is united with its celestial part, which has remained in heaven. He holds that the soul should seek felicity by detaching itself from its tenebrous body and worldly matters and access the world of immaterial lights. The souls of the gnostics and saints, after leaving the body, ascend even above the angelic world to enjoy proximity to the Supreme Light, which is the only absolute Reality.
Suhrawardi's Illuminationist project was to have far-reaching consequences for Islamic philosophy in Shi'ite Iran. In the 17th century, it was to initiate an Illuminationist Zoroastrian revival in the figure of the 16th century sage Azar Kayvan.
Suhrawardi considers a previous existence for every soul in the angelic realm before its descent to the realm of the body. The soul is divided into two parts, one remains in heaven and the other descends into the dungeon of the body. The human soul is always sad because it has been divorced from its other half. Therefore, it aspires to become reunited with it. The soul can only reach felicity again when it is united with its celestial part, which has remained in heaven.
He holds that the soul should seek felicity by detaching itself from its tenebrous body and worldly matters and access the world of immaterial lights. The souls of the gnostics and saints, after leaving the body, ascend even above the angelic world to enjoy proximity to the Supreme Light, which is the only absolute Reality. In the 17th century, it was to initiate an Illuminationist Zoroastrian revival in the figure of the 16th century sage Azar Kayvan.
Suhrawardi thought of himself as a reviver or resuscitator of the ancient Persian wisdom. There was among the ancient Persians a community of people guided by God who thus walked the true way, worthy Sage-Philosophers, with no resemblance to the Magi Dualists. Suhrawardi uses pre-Islamic Iranian gnosis, synthesizing it with Greek and Islamic wisdom.
0コメント